with the others: 1- We have seen many times that after hours of talks, wehave failed to achieve any success in the progress ofnegotiations, while we believe that the matter is completely clearand acceptable, but the other party refrains to accept it.

2- It is often seen that the other party has become more firmand bigoted in his belief after long discussions.

3- It is mostly seen that after a long discussion, we do not feelany more the previous sincerity and purity in our heart towardsthe other party and feel an unreasonable hatred and spitetowards him!

4- The history of religious discussions, quarrels and political doctrines shows that abundant powers used for proving a beliefor a doctrine as well as the numerous books prepared with aplenty of difficulties and costs have not been so useful.

5- It is often observed that scientific negotiations which arestarted in an earnest setting, have been led to quarrels andsometimes grappling and or mayhem of individuals, whileapparently there is no relation between" mayhem" and" scientif icdiscussion" and never one of them could be proved by the other.

6- We have repeatedly seen that the other party has no replyagainst our strong logic and has become silent. However, he hasnot accepted the matter and does not submit to it and or hate it!

These are the realities that most of those who are engaged inscientific, social, political and such like discussions, have moreor less experienced in the experiments and events of life and arevery noteworthy.

Why it is so? Because these discussions are not made withthe purpose of fact seeking. Rather, they have been made fordominance and victory over the adversary, and there is a bigdifference between them, although they are apparently the same.