The purpose of investigation and fact seeking is granting tosomeone what he lacks, without excluding him from anything, that is to say teaching him, without ruining his personality. But, the purpose of seemingly logical disputes and quarrels is depriving the other party from honor, pride and personality and hurting his affections against training what in his view or actually may not be so important and interesting.

Therefore, it is not surprising if he resists against it andhates it. So the psychologists say:

1- It is possible to suppress someone through dispute andquarrel, but we will never acquire his sincere approval.

2- It is impossible to convince an ignorant with the power oflogic and quarrel.

3- The best means for victory in discussion is avoiding it. Basically, the discussions, which are changed into struggle, offence or defense and in other words," controversy", less happento leave a considerable effect in attracting inward approval ofindividuals, and resistance of the other party indicates that heassumes his dignity and status in danger. Otherwise, negativeresis tance for teaching a matter to someone is senseless.

The discussions which agitate the other party and cause himto resist, may have been performed in one of the following ways:

1- The discussions mixed with humiliation of the other partyor his beliefs, for instance when it is said your opinion is notlogical at all; it is not wisely; no one agrees with it; this utteranceis not expected or is strange to be expressed by you!

2- The discussions which are made in presence of a thirdperson and the other party does not like to be defeated in hispresence( most people are so ).

3- When the discussion is made in a teaching mode, while the